Views on homosexuality

Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:32 pm

They should, and all people, just be taught that all sexuality should remain in private, gay or not.

Wasting resources on homosexuals is simply retarded. I honestly find the huge deal the Christian conservatives make about homosexuals utterly hilarious.

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:51 am

Homosexuality is a minor issue, but an issue none the less.

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:21 pm

American Nationalist wrote:

Ahh, so you're saying we should just tone them down without giving them what they want?

If what they want is just to be left alone as they are, that's no problem.

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:23 pm

Kacen wrote:

Wasting resources on homosexuals is simply retarded. I honestly find the huge deal the Christian conservatives make about homosexuals utterly hilarious.

Agreed. The holy nitwits are themselves much more of a problem.

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:35 am

Trajanus wrote:

American Nationalist wrote:

Ahh, so you're saying we should just tone them down without giving them what they want?

If what they want is just to be left alone as they are, that's no problem.

I disagree. The way they are is the problem.

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 1:21 pm

American Nationalist wrote:

I disagree. The way they are is the problem.

Need it be? They aren't contributing to overpopulation, and sexual orientation tells us nothing about what really counts--political orientation.

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:35 pm

Trajanus wrote:

American Nationalist wrote:

I disagree. The way they are is the problem.

Need it be? They aren't contributing to overpopulation, and sexual orientation tells us nothing about what really counts--political orientation.

Precisely.

Black Brigade Regular Joined: 13 Mar 2009 Posts: 23

I have read enough data for me to come to the conclusion that homosexual sex and bonding/pairing is a natural phenomenon and is found in many other species in the animal kingdom. However whether or not it's natural to me is irrelevant because ultimately it's a consensual act between two adults; so if two men or women want to have sex or have a life together, fine. I have heard some people argue and talk about the counter-productive and destructive elements found within homosexual circles but that can also be found in heterosexuals if not more so which leads me to conclude that it's an overall cultural-social problem. In short, I'm cool with "the gays," so long as they are cool with the State.

Black Brigade Regular Joined: 13 Mar 2009 Posts: 23

American Nationalist wrote:

It causes men to be effeminate, which causes weakness and liberalistic attitudes amongst the stronger sex and vice versa.

Effeminate behavior in gay men is caused by how society has traditionally viewed the gay man-as being less of a man, a faggot (using the older meaning of the word) and a woman at heart. Not to mention that is what the media puts out; you never see a normal average joe, gay man instead you see some pink-faced faggot prancing about talking about fashion and cock. Read the works of Jack Malebranche.

Quote:

Aside from that it's an unnecessary disgusting, repulsive, and indecent act.

Same could be said for heterosexual S&M, the use of dildos and other sex toys (unnecessary) and so on and so on which to me says it's a cultural-social problem not a inherent part of a specific group. Not to mention all of that is subjective-"what you find nice, I may find naughty and depraved."

Fascist Civillian Joined: 28 May 2009 Posts: 11

Panzerschreck wrote:

“No one is going to become homosexual by being around homosexuals,…”, by this statement you are saying that if a homosexually couple were to adopt a child that, that child will not have a far greater chance becoming one themselves? For won’t that child believe that “Life Style” is perfectly normal?

Someone either is homosexual or he/she is not, it has been proven that there are sertain genes which can make you either homosexual or heterosexual. Being raised by two men or woman does not improve the chance of someone 'becoming' gay. Offcourse this child will find homosexuality more normal, but that is not a problem.

I used to be against adoption of kids by homosexual couples, because it lacks either a father or mother figure. But i find that there are far worse places for a kid to grow up and far worse parents to get raised by. For instance: if the parents of a child are not very smart, have a below average IQ, the child is more likely to have a low IQ as well (even is adopted and having very good genes).

So no, i don't mind as long as they do not bother me with it.

Black Brigade Lieutenant Joined: 23 Sep 2009 Posts: 115

I see nothing wrong with homosexuality. I have friends who are gay, and they're good people. Its not the states business who you are attracted to, and it should stay that way. Although I find the parades a bit excessive, I understand the thought process behind them, and I think gays should be provided the rights of other citizens.

Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 12:29 pm

LittleFascie97 wrote:

I see nothing wrong with homosexuality. I have friends who are gay, and they're good people. Its not the states business who you are attracted to, and it should stay that way. Although I find the parades a bit excessive, I understand the thought process behind them, and I think gays should be provided the rights of other citizens.

IMO the right policy is tolerate but don't encourage.

Black Brigade Lieutenant Joined: 23 Sep 2009 Posts: 115

Trajanus wrote:

LittleFascie97 wrote:

I see nothing wrong with homosexuality. I have friends who are gay, and they're good people. Its not the states business who you are attracted to, and it should stay that way. Although I find the parades a bit excessive, I understand the thought process behind them, and I think gays should be provided the rights of other citizens.

IMO the right policy is tolerate but don't encourage.

Correct.

Black Brigade Lieutenant Joined: 01 Oct 2009 Posts: 136

I believe it should at least be strongly discouraged and ridiculed by society.

Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:52 am

Metal Gear wrote:

I believe it should at least be strongly discouraged and ridiculed by society.

The state shouldn't be pro or anti-gay.

We should remove any "sexuality" from politics.

It's trivial, really.